Cell Phone Coverage Map in Beverly Hills, CA

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Beverly Hills, CA area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. Verizon	2.89	9	Verizon Towers	Map
2. Sprint	2.29	7	Sprint Towers	Map
3. T-Mobile	1.4	5	T-Mobile Towers	Map
4. AT&T	0.86	14	AT&T Towers	Map
5. Nextel	0.5	2	Nextel Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 3 of 3

Prev 1, 2, 3

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
T-Mobile 0 Out of 5	Rodeo Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90210	Wed Dec 10, 2003
T-Mobile 0 Out of 5	I very rarely get a signal !

Advertisement
Advertisement

AT&T Wireless 2 Out of 5	Alta Dr. / Elevado, Beverly Hills, CA 90210	Sat Nov 01, 2003
AT&T Wireless 2 Out of 5	Reception dips in the Beverly Hills residential neighborhood. I believe it's due to the lack of towers. Reception in the commerical district is good.

Prev 1, 2, 3

Page 3 of 3

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: