Cell Phone Coverage Map in Blythe, CA

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Blythe, CA area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. Verizon	4	1	Verizon Towers	Map
2. Sprint	1	1	Sprint Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
Verizon 4 Out of 5 Phone Model: Samsung SCH-A850	Broadway / Chanslorway, Blythe, CA 92225	Fri May 18, 2007
Verizon 4 Out of 5 Phone Model: Samsung SCH-A850	Good reception up and down Ca. Hwy. 95, just so-so on Az. Hwy. 95 just across the river. Good most of the way to Yuma, and west to Indio / Palm Springs.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sprint 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: samsung i-600	Water Wheel Resort / CA - Hwy. 95, Blythe, CA 92225	Thu Jun 02, 2005
Sprint 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: samsung i-600	I get reception near the water, but poor on the water, and in the desert.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: