Home > Cell Phone Reception > Cell Phone Coverage Maps > CA > S > Cell Phone Coverage Map in Santa Clara, CA

Cell Phone Coverage Map in Santa Clara, CA - By Zip Code



Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Santa Clara, CA area.

Carrier

Avg Rating

No. of Comments

Towers

Coverage Map

1. Verizon 3.55 11 Verizon Towers Map
2. Sprint 3 1 Sprint Towers Map
3. AT&T 1.09 22 AT&T Towers Map
4. T-Mobile 0.44 9 T-Mobile Towers Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.


Page 1 of 5
1, 2, 3, 4, 5  

Comments Towers
FILTER: AT&T NEXTEL SPRINT T-MOBILE VERIZON

Carrier / Rating

Location / Comment

Date


AT&T
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
sony ericson
Saratoga / Scott Blvd., Santa Clara, CA 95050 Fri Dec 26, 2008

The reception is poor. Most of the time I can't hear clearly what the person on the other side is talking about. I get call failed occasionally or just the call just canceled automatically. My phone is showing 5 bars most of the time but would drop to 3 or no bars during call. I do get drop calls occasionally.


AT&T
0 Out of 5
0 Out of 5

Near SCU, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Fri Oct 19, 2007

Cingular has TERRIBLE reception in the area near Santa Clara University. Whenever I'm indoors, I always get dropped called, which is kind of ironic since Cingular's ads always say that they have the least dropped calls. Furthermore, whenever I try to call someone, I have to try countless times before I even manage to call through. When I eventually manage to get through, the reception is VERY bad and I can hardly hear what the other person is saying. It just sounds like this, "Hello? *insert 5 seconds of NOTHINGNESS* Hello? *insert another 5 seconds of hearing absolutely nothing at all* HELLO?? ARE YOU THERE? *gets disconnected*" I'm definitely switching to Verizon or T-Mobile. Shame on you, Cingular!


AT&T
0 Out of 5
0 Out of 5

Santa Clara University / Washington St., Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tue Oct 02, 2007

I used to have good reception for the longest time since i've been a Cingular customer but for the past 2 months i've have bad or almost no reception even in my open backyard. I usually have to walk out onto the street to get 2-3 bars to get my voicemails since nobody can call me when I don't have reception so my phone can't even register a missed call for me to get back to them. I called AT&T and apparently about 2 months ago they stopped paying T-Mobile to allow its users to roam off the T-Mobile towers, so until enough people call in and complain to AT&T so that they can fill in a form of complaint, they are not going to reverse their decision, and bad reception is all we're gonna get. I feel so cheated for paying for a service i'm not even getting!


Advertisement
 

AT&T
2 Out of 5
2 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Apple iPhone
Los Padres Blvd. / Pruneridge Ave., Santa Clara, CA 95050 Thu Sep 20, 2007

Very spotty in the house. Calls go in and out frequently. Have to go outdoors to get better reception. AT&T, put a tower in our area!


AT&T
0 Out of 5
0 Out of 5

Santa Clara University / lafayette, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Wed Sep 05, 2007

i usually get no reception in the house. I usually need to go out of the house to get a reception.


AT&T
2 Out of 5
2 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Blackberry Pearl
Los Padres / Pruneridge, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Mon Jun 04, 2007

Horrible reception indoors, but decent outdoors. Usually 1-2 bars indoors, but calls are frequently dropped and many times I will see "Call Failed"


AT&T
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Saratoga / Pruneridge, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Mon Dec 11, 2006

Almost non-existent in the house. Verizon slightly better. T Mobile bad. This is a dead area. Buyer beware. Check T Mobile site and you'll see bad coverage.


Advertisement
 

AT&T
3 Out of 5
3 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Nokia 6682
Monroe St. / Scott, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Sat Sep 09, 2006

I usually see 4-5 bars. Even then the voice breaks when I receive a call. The people on the other side don't have any issues. Initially I felt it was a problem with the instrument, so replaced it with another one. Have the same problem with another equipment, but slightly less severe. Don't know the issue yet.Any help will be appreciated


AT&T
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Nokia 6230
St. Claire's Parish / Lafayette, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Mon Jan 09, 2006

Service is poor AND sporadic. No network reading occurs with great frequency when I attempt to make a call from home. Bluetooch warning of no service available happens all the time on I-280, Benton, Homestead and Market St.(near SCU). When traveling in other cities the service is good. Sure would like cell phone to work at home.


Verizon
5 Out of 5
5 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Motorola RAZR V3c
Benton and San Tomas, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Sat Dec 31, 2005

Couldn't get any signal from Cingular in my house so switched to Verizon and enjoying perfect reception now.



1, 2, 3, 4, 5  
Page 1 of 5


Newest Cell Phones


LG Viper HTC Evo 4G LTE LG Lucid Samsung Brightside Samsung Rugby Smart
LG Viper HTC Evo 4G LTE LG Lucid Samsung Brightside Samsung Rugby Smart
Sprint Sprint Verizon Verizon AT&T

View More Phones View more New Cell Phones


Cell Phone Reception Review Form


All fields in bold need to be completed.

Carrier:

Alltel
AT&T (Cingular)
Cellular One
Cricket
MetroPCS
Nextel
Qwest
Sprint
T-Mobile
US Cellular
Verizon Wireless
Virgin Mobile
Select which network you wish to comment on.

Phone Model:

Enter the phone used to test reception.

Zip Code:

Enter zip code of reception review location.

Location or Major Street:

Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)

Major Street 2:
(For intersections)

If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.

Reception Rating:

5 - Perfect
4 - Good
3 - Average
2 - Below Average
1 - Poor
0 - No Reception
How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)

Comments: