Cell Phone Coverage Map in East Lyme, CT

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the East Lyme, CT area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. Verizon	5	1	Verizon Towers	Map
3. Sprint	0	1	Sprint Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
Sprint 0 Out of 5	Quailcrest Rd., East Lyme, CT 06333	Mon Dec 05, 2005
Sprint 0 Out of 5	No reception at all in my neighborhood near Cedar Ridge golf course. Average reception in the rest of East Lyme (1 to 2 bars). Quitting Sprint because of it.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Verizon 5 Out of 5 Phone Model: LG VX8000	Dean Rd., East Lyme, CT 06333	Tue Sep 06, 2005
Verizon 5 Out of 5 Phone Model: LG VX8000	Excellent in the area, I have service almost everywhere and only a few dead spots most of which no one can get service in. I highly recomend this to anyone.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: