Cell Phone Coverage Map in Riverside, CT

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Riverside, CT area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. Verizon	4	1	Verizon Towers	Map
2. AT&T	1	1	AT&T Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: Apple iPhone	95 Summit Rd., Riverside, CT 06878	Mon Jul 02, 2007
AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: Apple iPhone	signal is normally between no reception and poor, although ATT says on its website signal in the area is good (3 in a 1 to 4 scale).

Advertisement
Advertisement

Verizon 4 Out of 5 Phone Model: Motorola V60i	US 1 / Sheephill Rd., Riverside, CT 06878	Mon Jan 26, 2004
Verizon 4 Out of 5 Phone Model: Motorola V60i	I have found that Verizon is the only decent service in the Greenwich, CT area... all others pale in comparison.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: