Cell Phone Coverage Map in Weatogue, CT

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Weatogue, CT area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. AT&T	0.67	3	AT&T Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
AT&T 0 Out of 5	Hopmeadow / Latimer Lane, Weatogue, CT 06089	Sat Mar 01, 2008
AT&T 0 Out of 5	Notorious dead zone near Latimer Lane school in Simsbury for Cingular. No reception at all.

Advertisement
Advertisement

AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: lg cu500	Hopmeadow St. / Rt. 44, Weatogue, CT 06089	Tue Jul 03, 2007
AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: lg cu500	All they can tell you is to remove sim card and power off phone more frequently

AT&T 1 Out of 5	Simsbury Manor, Weatogue, CT 06089	Thu Dec 29, 2005
AT&T 1 Out of 5	This whole neigborhood is zero, or so off and on it's useless for Cinular or Verizon.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: