Cell Phone Coverage Map in Woodbury, CT

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Woodbury, CT area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. Verizon	0	1	Verizon Towers	Map
3. Sprint	0	1	Sprint Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
Sprint 0 Out of 5 Phone Model: Sanyo PM-8200 (SCP-8200)	Flanders Rd. / Coach Light, Woodbury, CT 06798	Fri Jun 01, 2007
	No service on Flanders going towards bethlehem. I Had Cingular before and it seemed to word better over all in the woodbury area.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Verizon 0 Out of 5	Woodbury, CT, Woodbury, CT 06798	Thu Feb 26, 2004
Verizon 0 Out of 5	Woodbury is god awful for ALL cell phones, except Sprint PCS. I have had every carrier there is - AT&T, Verizon, Nextel, Cingular, and Sprint. Not one worked until I purchase Sprint PCS last month.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: