Cell Phone Coverage Map in Babson Park, FL

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Babson Park, FL area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. Nextel	1	1	Nextel Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
Nextel 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: Motorola i60c	SR 17, Babson Park, FL 33827	Tue Jan 04, 2005
Nextel 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: Motorola i60c	Nextel reception is spotty at best. By simply pivoting 90-degrees, reception can go from full to nothing. During the recent hurricanes, while other carriers like Alltel and Verizon never lost reception, Nextel was completely useless for a week at a time. Reception is still spotty heading into more urban areas, and can drop simply by passing a building. While the walkie feature is nice, it can be very annoying with garbled messages and failed connections.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: