Cell Phone Coverage Map in Tavares, FL

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Tavares, FL area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. AT&T	3	2	AT&T Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: Samsung SGH-E317	Lake Jem / CR 448 and Lois Dr., Tavares, FL 32778	Thu Feb 15, 2007
AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: Samsung SGH-E317	We are constantly having to roam the yard during a phone call to keep any kind of signal. Inside the house we can stand by the kitchen sink and get an intermitent signal. We are hoping that Sprint gets approved for the new tower at CR 448 and Sadler Rd.

Advertisement
Advertisement

AT&T 5 Out of 5 Phone Model: Nokia 8390	Rt. 19 / C.R. 448, Tavares, FL 32778	Sun Mar 26, 2006
AT&T 5 Out of 5 Phone Model: Nokia 8390	No problems since April, 2002.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: