Cell Phone Coverage Map in Crawford, GA

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Crawford, GA area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. AT&T	1	1	AT&T Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: cingular sync	Hwy. 78 Crawford,ga / E. Cemetry Dr., Crawford, GA 30630	Tue Mar 20, 2007
AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: cingular sync	Had the Cingular sync... cool phone but reception was terrible in my home and sometimes outside, would have to walk around in circles trying to find signal and it was weak then..dropped calls like a rookie receiver dropping passes. Did some complaining to the local store and did some research and switched phones, now I have the Motorola V365 and it works much better! haven't dropped a call yet,if I did I was going to drop my contract!

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: