Home > Cell Phone Reception > Cell Phone Coverage Maps > IL > J > Cell Phone Coverage Map in Junction, IL

Cell Phone Coverage Map in Junction, IL - By Carrier



Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Junction, IL area.

Carrier

Avg Rating

No. of Comments

Towers

Coverage Map

1. Verizon 5 1 Verizon Towers Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.


Page 1 of 1

Comments Towers
FILTER: AT&T NEXTEL SPRINT T-MOBILE VERIZON

Carrier / Rating

Location / Comment

Date


Verizon
5 Out of 5
5 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Audiovox CDM 8600
Rt. 13 / Rt. 1, Junction, IL 62954 Thu Aug 18, 2005

Excellent service along Rt. 13 west to Harrisburg and north along Rt. 1. through Omaha. Reception on Rt. 13 in Shawneetown is 0-1 - if a call can be completed at all, it is usually dropped within a minute.



Page 1 of 1


Newest Cell Phones


LG Viper HTC Evo 4G LTE LG Lucid Samsung Brightside Samsung Rugby Smart
LG Viper HTC Evo 4G LTE LG Lucid Samsung Brightside Samsung Rugby Smart
Sprint Sprint Verizon Verizon AT&T

View More Phones View more New Cell Phones


Cell Phone Reception Review Form


All fields in bold need to be completed.

Carrier:

Alltel
AT&T (Cingular)
Cellular One
Cricket
MetroPCS
Nextel
Qwest
Sprint
T-Mobile
US Cellular
Verizon Wireless
Virgin Mobile
Select which network you wish to comment on.

Phone Model:

Enter the phone used to test reception.

Zip Code:

Enter zip code of reception review location.

Location or Major Street:

Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)

Major Street 2:
(For intersections)

If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.

Reception Rating:

5 - Perfect
4 - Good
3 - Average
2 - Below Average
1 - Poor
0 - No Reception
How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)

Comments: