Cell Phone Coverage Map in Orangeville, IL

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Orangeville, IL area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. AT&T	0.5	2	AT&T Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
AT&T 0 Out of 5 Phone Model: razor v3	Hyw 69 / 26, Orangeville, IL 61060	Sun Dec 24, 2006
AT&T 0 Out of 5 Phone Model: razor v3	I have no reception from north of new glarus, wisconsin to frreeport, illinois. Very frustrating since most of our family still live in this area.

Advertisement
Advertisement

AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: motorola razor v3	Bellview Rd., Orangeville, IL 61060	Sun Sep 10, 2006
AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: motorola razor v3	The area is very poor for Cingular cell reception. My carrier says its do to the towers being anolog and my phone doesn't recieve an anolog signal.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: