Cell Phone Coverage Map in Haviland, KS - By Carrier

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Haviland, KS area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. Verizon	5	1	Verizon Towers	Map
2. AT&T	1	1	AT&T Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: HTC Kaiser	E 10th St., Haviland, KS 67059	Mon Apr 13, 2009
AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: HTC Kaiser	AT&T signal reception is real bad in Halstead in general. It works sometimes out in the streets, but phones are completely dead inside the buildings. Worse thing is it only works in part of the downtown!

Advertisement
Advertisement

Verizon 5 Out of 5	Greensburg, KS, Haviland, KS 67059	Sun Oct 18, 2009
Verizon 5 Out of 5	We love our new Verizon phones. The service seems to pick up better with Verizon phones then Alltel phones.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: