Home > Cell Phone Reception > Cell Phone Coverage Maps > LA > D > Cell Phone Coverage Map in Deridder, LA > AT&T Coverage Map in Deridder, LA

AT&T Coverage Map in Deridder, LA



AT&T coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Deridder, LA area.

Carrier

Avg Rating

No. of Comments

Towers

Coverage Map

1. AT&T 1.6 5 AT&T Towers Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.


Page 1 of 1

Comments Towers
FILTER: AT&T NEXTEL SPRINT T-MOBILE VERIZON

Carrier / Rating

Location / Comment

Date


AT&T
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Blsvkberry Curve
3 Miles South of Deridder, Deridder, LA 70634 Sun Dec 11, 2011

First Cell was Sprint, Bought at Ft Polk. Didnt know Sprint had a repeater over vendor area. Great signal there, walk outside nothing. Second Cell was Centenial, decent service around Pickering and Ft Polk. Moved to Deridder and service was very marginal. Switched to AT&T. Service still lousy, considering going back to Centenial which is Celluar 1 now hoping it will be better now since they merged.


AT&T
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Bold 9000
362 Dees St., Deridder, LA 70634 Tue Nov 22, 2011

Ft. Polk the home of Heroes is also the Home of no Cellular service. I have had ATT for over two years now until I moved to Deridder, La. The service is awful. You are better off getting a home line, because it is the only way to communicate with friends and family. I feel as if ATT have neglected this area of good service completely.


AT&T
4 Out of 5
4 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Apple iPhone 4
DeRidder, LA, Deridder, LA 70634 Fri Dec 10, 2010

It looks like 3G is now live in DeRidder! I've had good reception on voice calls, other than AT&T's normal dropped calls or calls going straight to voicemail, but cellular data has been worthless in the area. Hopefully that will now change.


Advertisement
 

AT&T
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Solstice
DeRidder / Longville, Deridder, LA 70634 Fri Dec 03, 2010

At&t service is really bad in DeRidder. No matter how many times any of us call, all they say is that they are working on the towers and that 3G will be available soon. Not likely. We hate having to call voicemail to get messages. And calls? I do not even receive my calls anymore. I am seriously considering switching, but it seems as if no other service is doing any better to improve service in this area.


AT&T
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Apple iPhone 3GS
Ellis / Hwy. 190, Deridder, LA 70634 Sat Jun 05, 2010

ATT Service is really poor hear in the ft polk area. I have never had issues like this before with coverage and ATT needs to do something or I will drop them like a hot rock. No 3GS service is available hear so the features I am paying if the work at are slow. Dropped calls and no signal are major problems. I have called customer service on several occasions and they are polite but useless. Im fed up.



Page 1 of 1


Related Cell Phones


Samsung Rugby Smart Samsung Galaxy Note AT&T Impulse 4G HTC One X HTC Titan 2
Samsung Rugby Smart Samsung Galaxy Note AT&T Impulse 4G HTC One X HTC Titan 2
AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T AT&T

View More Phones View more AT&T Phones


Cell Phone Reception Review Form


All fields in bold need to be completed.

Carrier:

Alltel
AT&T (Cingular)
Cellular One
Cricket
MetroPCS
Nextel
Qwest
Sprint
T-Mobile
US Cellular
Verizon Wireless
Virgin Mobile
Select which network you wish to comment on.

Phone Model:

Enter the phone used to test reception.

Zip Code:

Enter zip code of reception review location.

Location or Major Street:

Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)

Major Street 2:
(For intersections)

If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.

Reception Rating:

5 - Perfect
4 - Good
3 - Average
2 - Below Average
1 - Poor
0 - No Reception
How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)

Comments: