|
Home >
Cell Phone Carriers >
Cell Phone Coverage
> MD >
L >
Laurel MD Coverage |
|
Laurel, MD - Cell Phone Coverage |
|
If you would like to give your visitors access to Coverage Comments, you can get the HTML code
to post on your website free! |
Laurel, MD Cell Phone Service Comments - Read what residents have to say about cell phone coverage in Laurel, MD. Service
comments are sorted by date. However, users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating,
or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.
For more options, return to the Cell Phone Reception Search.
|
| Carrier / Rating |
Location / Comment
| Date |
T-Mobile
 4 Out of 5
Phone Model: Samsung SGH-E335
|
All Saints Rd. / North Laurel Rd. intersection, Laurel, MD 20723 |
Sat Nov 10, 2007 |
T-Mobile improved service just this past week. Whereas my calls before were dropped almost every time, now I can actually call people from inside my apartment. I can even move around the apartment and the signal will degrade to only 3 or 2 bars.
|
 |
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
 |
Verizon Wireless
 4 Out of 5
Phone Model: Samsung SCH-A650
|
Bond Mill Rd. / Rt. 198 intersection, Laurel, MD 20707 |
Fri May 11, 2007 |
I don't really pay attention to bars of reception; it's probably 3 or 4 in most places, and the voice quality is almost always clear and loud. I have used this phone for the past 2 1 / 2 years and don't remember ever dropping a call anywhere. It works in every room in my house, including the cellar; in my car wherever I've traveled; in stores; even out in the woods in Indiana. Maybe my phone's analog reception helps there. I have no complaints about Verizon's coverage.
|
 |
Nextel
 3 Out of 5
Phone Model: Motorola i836
|
216 / All Saints Rd. intersection, Laurel, MD 20723 |
Sun Jul 23, 2006 |
One of the few places I get in reception since Sprint took over nextel
|
 |
Nextel
 0 Out of 5
Phone Model: Motorola i836
|
Exit To 95s From 32e, Laurel, MD 20723 |
Sun Jul 23, 2006 |
Since Sprint took over nextel, I always drop a call on the exit and don't get recption back until right before the rest stop.
|
 |
Nextel
 1 Out of 5
Phone Model: Nextel I m710 |
Contee Rd. / Rt. 197 intersection, Laurel, MD 20708 |
Thu Jul 13, 2006 |
Nextel is absolutely the worst carrier I have ever had!
|
 |
AT&T
 1 Out of 5
Phone Model: SAMSUNG x427 |
Rt 1 Right Before Gorman Rd.INT., Laurel, MD 20723 |
Thu Feb 09, 2006 |
About 1 / 4 mile before the rt.1 / Gorman Rd intersection in Laurel, MD there is horrendous to NO reception.
|
 |
Sprint
 2 Out of 5
Phone Model: Sanyo PM-8200 (SCP-8200)
|
Rt. 216 and 95 / All Saints Rd.& Route 216 intersection, Laurel, MD 20723 |
Wed Jan 25, 2006 |
Called complaint into Sprint PCS and was told 'this is a known dead zone with no plans (as of 01 / 24 / 06) to put up any more towers due to funding issues'. Nice... ..Sprint will SELL phones (actually has a store with in 3 miles of here) to unsuspecting customers.
|
 |
Verizon Wireless
 5 Out of 5
Phone Model: LG VX8000
|
South Laurel Dr., Laurel, MD 20708 |
Fri Dec 09, 2005 |
My service with Verizon has been great. I've read some of the complaints involving Verizon service and I heard that the best brand of phone to use with Verizon service is LG because it works best with Verizon's towers. Also, some of those Verizon users with the complaints may not be updating their phones software by pressing *228 at least once a month. Of course, everyone's case is different.
|
 |
T-Mobile
 1 Out of 5
Phone Model: Motorola V300
|
Rt. 216 / Old Scaggsville Rd., Laurel, MD 20723 |
Thu Oct 13, 2005 |
Almost no reception at all in North Laurel. Do not get T-Mobile if you live in the laurel area. When I go inside, I get no reception, have to face a window or go outside to make a call. my contract ends soon so I hope to switch to Cingular which seems to have better reception in laurel.
|
 |
T-Mobile
 1 Out of 5
Phone Model: Samsung SGH-E335
|
North Laurel Rd. / Sylvan Still Rd. intersection, Laurel, MD 20723 |
Fri Sep 09, 2005 |
Inside my apartment, I get either one or no bars. On my balcony, I can get two if I'm lucky. Moving around my apartment, I lose the signal. So, to make a call, I have to be perfectly still. This is OK, since I just put the cell phone down on a stool and use the ear piece to speak into it. But it also sort of defeats the purpose of a cell phone. I was hoping that I could just have a cell phone as my primary phone, but it seems that I may have to get a land line. Reading the other reviews for this part of Laurel, it seems you would get bad reception no matter who the carrier is. My neighbor also complains about bad reception. The most vexing part is that my phone gets good reception if I go about a mile north or south of here. So it seems like I'm in this no-man's land between cell towers. I bet you the first company to move in here would have a lot of people switching to them. So, I suppose if you are going to live in North Laurel, think about a land line.
|
 |
|
1, 2, 3 Next |
| Page 1 of 3 |
Cell Phone Reception Review Form
|
|
|
|