Nextel Coverage Map in Columbus, MI

Nextel coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Columbus, MI area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
4. Nextel	0	1	Nextel Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
Nextel 0 Out of 5 Phone Model: i305	Palms / Division, Columbus, MI 48063	Fri Apr 01, 2005
Nextel 0 Out of 5 Phone Model: i305	Very seldomly can I recieve or make a call at my business in this area. Nextel says they are going to improve the reception in this area. They have said this for 18 months. I am dropping Nextel and am going to research who has service on the tower less than one mile from my home. These jokers will tell you anything to keep you paying their salaries. My minimum monthly service charge is $165 for my 3 Nextel business phones and can't even use them at the business.

Page 1 of 1

Related Cell Phones


Motorola i1	Motorola Clutch (i465)	Motorola Stature i9	Motorola i776	RIM BlackBerry Curve (8350i)
Nextel	Nextel	Nextel	Nextel	Nextel

View more Nextel Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: