Cell Phone Coverage Map in Lexington, MO

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Lexington, MO area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. T-Mobile	1	1	T-Mobile Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
T-Mobile 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: MyTouch 4g	Lexington, Lexington, MO 64067	Mon Jan 09, 2012
T-Mobile 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: MyTouch 4g	Worst phone company EVER! Do not sign up, WORST customer service and horrible coverage! Got the '4g' phones 1 year ago, they lied about coverage. When we called they said we'd have at least 3g by september which was 4 months ago, still on edge. Have never once got a video chat to go through, unless you have 20 minutes to wait on pages to load the data plan is useless, even when we go to the city and we hit the rate 3g coverage! Bottom line: TMOBILE SUCKS!

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: