Cell Phone Coverage Map in Oak Vale, MS - By Zip Code

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Oak Vale, MS area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. AT&T	1	2	AT&T Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: any type	Hwy. 43 / Harlon Ward Rd.And HWY 43, Oak Vale, MS 39656	Thu Aug 11, 2011
AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: any type	Poor service from GW Smith road and Coyle King Lane off Hwy. 43!

Advertisement
Advertisement

AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: LG 110	HWY 43 Oakvale, Oak Vale, MS 39656	Sat Nov 15, 2008
AT&T 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: LG 110	At family's in Oakvale, in southeastern Lawrence County, little to no reception. They need to build a tower close by there. There are quite a few people living there, and you have to just about climb a tree to get a signal.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: