Home > Cell Phone Reception > Cell Phone Coverage Maps > MS > W > Cell Phone Coverage Map in Walls, MS

Cell Phone Coverage Map in Walls, MS - By Zip Code



Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Walls, MS area.

Carrier

Avg Rating

No. of Comments

Towers

Coverage Map

1. AT&T 1 1 AT&T Towers Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.


Page 1 of 1

Comments Towers
FILTER: AT&T NEXTEL SPRINT T-MOBILE VERIZON

Carrier / Rating

Location / Comment

Date


AT&T
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Motorola V220
Lake Forest / Goodman Rd.Near Hwy. 61, Walls, MS 38680 Mon Aug 01, 2005

I get so many dropped calls in this area, inside and outside of my house. I was told to go to scenic hollow and cut my phone off and back on, this is the closest tower oustide of horn lake. I hope this works.



Page 1 of 1


Newest Cell Phones


LG Viper HTC Evo 4G LTE LG Lucid Samsung Brightside Samsung Rugby Smart
LG Viper HTC Evo 4G LTE LG Lucid Samsung Brightside Samsung Rugby Smart
Sprint Sprint Verizon Verizon AT&T

View More Phones View more New Cell Phones


Cell Phone Reception Review Form


All fields in bold need to be completed.

Carrier:

Alltel
AT&T (Cingular)
Cellular One
Cricket
MetroPCS
Nextel
Qwest
Sprint
T-Mobile
US Cellular
Verizon Wireless
Virgin Mobile
Select which network you wish to comment on.

Phone Model:

Enter the phone used to test reception.

Zip Code:

Enter zip code of reception review location.

Location or Major Street:

Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)

Major Street 2:
(For intersections)

If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.

Reception Rating:

5 - Perfect
4 - Good
3 - Average
2 - Below Average
1 - Poor
0 - No Reception
How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)

Comments: