Cell Phone Coverage Map in Yellowtail, MT

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Yellowtail, MT area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. Verizon	0	1	Verizon Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
Verizon 0 Out of 5 Phone Model: LG VX3400	Ft. Smith / Hwy. 313, Yellowtail, MT 59035	Wed Mar 26, 2008
Verizon 0 Out of 5 Phone Model: LG VX3400	We occasionally have 1 bar with Verizon, using a Yagi directional antenna. We had good coverage with my Nokia 5120 (trimodal) and Cingular (now ATT) until feb 18 when they canceled my service. There is now no cell coverage in Ft. Smith thanks to the FCC and the greed of the cell carriers causing them to only service high density (profitable) areas. This is a safety issue - break down in the winter and you may die! THANKS FCC. Call your congressman.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: