Cell Phone Coverage Map in Ocean Gate, NJ

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Ocean Gate, NJ area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. AT&T	4	1	AT&T Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
AT&T 4 Out of 5 Phone Model: Sony Ericsson T637	Ocean Gate Dr. / Rt. 9, Ocean Gate, NJ 08740	Tue Dec 28, 2004
AT&T 4 Out of 5 Phone Model: Sony Ericsson T637	I had Verizon for years and just accepted the fact that my phone wouldn't work anywhere in my house. I was scared to try anyone else, fearing they would all be even worse. Little did I know, true happiness could be found with Cingular. I switched after the merger with AT&T Wireless and it's been amazing. I never knew what it felt like to be on a cell phone and in my house, until know. I am the happiest I have ever been. Thank you Cingular.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: