Cell Phone Coverage Map in Cerrillos, NM - By Reception Rating

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Cerrillos, NM area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. Verizon	0	1	Verizon Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
Verizon 0 Out of 5 Phone Model: Palm Treo 650	Hwy. 14 / County Rd.55A, Cerrillos, NM 87010	Mon Jul 09, 2007
Verizon 0 Out of 5 Phone Model: Palm Treo 650	There is no or extremely spotty reception along the entire Galisteo Creek corridor. This goes from Conchas dam at the intersection of the Rio Grande and Galisteo Creek, thru Cerrillos and El Dorado and on to Pecos. I've been a Verizon customer for many years but I'm being forced to swith to Alltel because they appear to have my area (Santa Fe) ringed with towers and Verizon apears to have one down by Alberque some where.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: