Cell Phone Coverage Map in Jeromesville, OH

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Jeromesville, OH area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. Verizon	1	1	Verizon Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
Verizon 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: Motorola Droid X	Old 30..Route 30A, Jeromesville, OH 44840	Sun Jun 19, 2011
Verizon 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: Motorola Droid X	Very bad reception for data transfer. I can't get 3G service only 1G with one bar. I'm returning my phone because I don't want to pay for a data plan that is useles a home where I spend most of my time. Voice is a little bit better but spotty. I have to go outside (can't get much reception in the house anywhere) and that's pretty hard in the winter time or when it's raining. In other words, rural america is not on Verizon's scope.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: