Cell Phone Coverage Map in Maple Heights, OH

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Maple Heights, OH area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. T-Mobile	1	1	T-Mobile Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
T-Mobile 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: Sony Ericsson T610	Lee Rd. / Libby Rd., Maple Heights, OH 44137	Wed Jul 27, 2005
T-Mobile 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: Sony Ericsson T610	Absolutely worst mobile company on the planet. No reception anywhere that's residental. Customer service calls to complain about reception gives you one of three responces: 1. Our network is experincing trouble due to storm / DST / repairs / flocks of seagulls / solar winds 2. We are building more towers in your area (yea right!) 3. We do not gaurentee reception. Thanks a lot t-(non)mobile. I'm switching over to Cingular!

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: