Cell Phone Coverage Map in Allen, OK

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Allen, OK area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
1. AT&T	1	1	AT&T Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
AT&T 1 Out of 5	Lee St., Allen, OK 74825	Fri Oct 19, 2007
AT&T 1 Out of 5	I can hardly use my phone at home. I see people standing out on their sidewalks talking on their phones--trying for a signal. Their is an oil / gas boom in W. Hughes, and E. Pontotoc county in Oklahoma--Coal County is some better. Very poor service from Cingular. My neighbor just switched to US cellular (from AT and T) with better results. I'm next. WB Allen, Oklahoma

Advertisement
Advertisement

US Cellular 1 Out of 5	Downtown, Allen, OK 74825	Wed Aug 22, 2007
US Cellular 1 Out of 5	Signal varies from no signal to a poor signal.

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: