Home > Cell Phone Reception > Cell Phone Coverage Maps > OR > B > Cell Phone Coverage Map in Beaverton, OR > Sprint Coverage Map in Beaverton, OR

Sprint Coverage Map in Beaverton, OR



Sprint coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Beaverton, OR area.

Carrier

Avg Rating

No. of Comments

Towers

Coverage Map

1. Sprint 2.57 7 Sprint Towers Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.


Page 1 of 1

Comments Towers
FILTER: AT&T NEXTEL SPRINT T-MOBILE VERIZON

Carrier / Rating

Location / Comment

Date


Sprint
0 Out of 5
0 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Samsung Rant
10000 SW Allen Blvd.South, Beaverton, OR / Western Ave., Beaverton, OR 97005 Wed Apr 25, 2012

The coverage in this area used to be fine. About four weeks ago, it abruptly went downhill. I cannot send or receive text messages. Sometimes I cannot make or receive phone calls even when I'm showing four or five bars. My phone constantly roams and this drains the battery. I have updated the phone and PRL to no avail. Turning it off and back on does not help either.


Sprint
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
HTC Evo
Western Ave. / Allen Blvd., Beaverton, OR 97005 Tue Mar 27, 2012

For about three weeks now, I have been getting no reception at or around my Beaverton office (inside or out). Annoyingly, this drains my phone's battery like crazy, as it's constantly trying to connect.


Sprint
4 Out of 5
4 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Motorola Droid Incredible
Milikan Business Center / Murray Blvd., Beaverton, OR 97006 Fri Nov 25, 2011

Just switched from Verizon where it was fine at my home, but terrible on the way to work on 72nd in Tigard. So far Sprint has given me no problems as I commute from all over Beaverton, Vancouver, and TIgard. So much better and cheaper than Verizon.


Advertisement
 

Sprint
4 Out of 5
4 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Blackberry Curve
185th / Bany, Beaverton, OR 97007 Sat Oct 15, 2011

I get great reception anywhere in my home. Around my neighborhood works great as well.


Sprint
5 Out of 5
5 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Sanyo RL-4920
NW West Union / Laidlaw, Beaverton, OR 97006 Tue Jul 24, 2007

Great Reception on this phone and several others also.


Sprint
3 Out of 5
3 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Samsung SPH I-500
SW Murray / SW Dexton Mtn, Beaverton, OR 97007 Mon Sep 05, 2005

I have a steady 3 of 5 bars. Never get dropped and have great reception whether local or long distance.


Sprint
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
LG VX6000
West Union / NW 174th / laidlaw / Bronson / NW 174th, Beaverton, OR 97006 Sun Jul 24, 2005

No reception from home. If I do get through I turn my head and service is gone. Lose reception all the time from cell to cell or cell to home when in the Walker Rd and 158th area and many locations in Beaverton. Not sure if it is the service is overloaded and generally poor or crummy phones. They worked fine the 1st 6 months but incredibly ridiculous service the last 6 months.




Page 1 of 1


Write a Review on Your Carrier


This site wouldn't be possible without the contributions of visitors like you. If you found the site helpful, please take a moment and share your carrier experiences -- good or bad -- to help others looking for the best carrier in their area. Thank you.

All fields in bold must be completed.

Carrier:

AT&T
Cellular One
Cricket
MetroPCS
Sprint
T-Mobile
US Cellular
Verizon Wireless
Select which network you wish to comment on.

Phone Model:

Enter the phone used to test reception.

Zip Code:

Enter zip code of reception review location.

Location or Major Street:

Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)

Major Street 2:
(For intersections)

If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.

Reception Rating:

5 - Perfect
4 - Good
3 - Average
2 - Below Average
1 - Poor
0 - No Reception
How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)

Comments: