Home > Cell Phone Reception > Cell Phone Coverage Maps > SC > C > Cell Phone Coverage Map in Camden, SC

Cell Phone Coverage Map in Camden, SC - By Reception Rating



Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Camden, SC area.

Carrier

Avg Rating

No. of Comments

Towers

Coverage Map

1. AT&T 4 1 AT&T Towers Map
2. Sprint 4 1 Sprint Towers Map
3. T-Mobile 2.33 3 T-Mobile Towers Map
4. Verizon 1.67 3 Verizon Towers Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.


Page 1 of 1

Comments Towers
FILTER: AT&T NEXTEL SPRINT T-MOBILE VERIZON

Carrier / Rating

Location / Comment

Date


Sprint
4 Out of 5
4 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Samsung epic 4G
2240 West Dekalb St., Camden, SC 29020 Sat May 12, 2012

Good reception a few dead spots in camden but data is slow good thing Sprint is doing their network vision should be fixed in the next 6-18 months


AT&T
4 Out of 5
4 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Apple iPhone 4S
2240 West Dekalb St., Camden, SC 29020 Sat May 12, 2012

Great reception in Camden SC with ATT


Verizon
4 Out of 5
4 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Apple iPhone 4S
2240 West Dekalb St., Camden, SC 29020 Sat May 12, 2012

Great reception with Verizon in camden sc recommended


Advertisement
 

T-Mobile
3 Out of 5
3 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Samsung Galaxy S 4G
2240 West Dekalb St., Camden, SC 29020 Sat May 12, 2012

Overall good alternative to big competitors in Camden sc


T-Mobile
2 Out of 5
2 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Motorola RAZR
John G. Richards Rd. (Hwy 97) / Sycamore Rd., Camden, SC 29020 Wed Jul 27, 2011

Signal is fair outside my house but reception is usually zero inside.


T-Mobile
2 Out of 5
2 Out of 5

Phone Model:
t-mobile tap
Brookgreen Ct., Camden, SC 29020 Sat Aug 21, 2010

my phone beeps 4 times and then just cuts off like i'm being alloted so many minutes per call... ..never had this trouble before... ..


Verizon
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
LG VX8100
US 1 / Old Stagecoach Rd., Camden, SC 29020 Mon Jul 18, 2005

No to Poor reception on Verizon Extended Network, any ***any*** head movement drops call; though coverage is full strength in Camden, tired of 3 mi drive every time I need to make a call. Verizon aware of problem and doing nothing about it. Will not be renewing my contact; will be getting sat phone.


Advertisement
 

Verizon
0 Out of 5
0 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Motorola W385
Methodist Camp RD, Camden, SC 29020 Tue Aug 24, 2010

We had Alltel for many years and have always had decent service at this location. Maybe a few dropped calls, but we could count on using it. Since going to Verizon, the cell phone is useless at this location and the battery lasts about three hours as it is constantly searching.I have been on the phone with customer service and the technicians for many hours and have absolutely nothing resolved except the fact that they cannot help me. No, I would not recommend this service and yes, I am looking for a way out




Page 1 of 1


Write a Review on Your Carrier


This site wouldn't be possible without the contributions of visitors like you. If you found the site helpful, please take a moment and share your carrier experiences -- good or bad -- to help others looking for the best carrier in their area. Thank you.

All fields in bold must be completed.

Carrier:

AT&T
Cellular One
Cricket
MetroPCS
Sprint
T-Mobile
US Cellular
Verizon Wireless
Select which network you wish to comment on.

Phone Model:

Enter the phone used to test reception.

Zip Code:

Enter zip code of reception review location.

Location or Major Street:

Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)

Major Street 2:
(For intersections)

If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.

Reception Rating:

5 - Perfect
4 - Good
3 - Average
2 - Below Average
1 - Poor
0 - No Reception
How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)

Comments: