Cell Phone Coverage Map in Rio Frio, TX - By Reception Rating

Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Rio Frio, TX area.

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments	Towers	Coverage Map
3. Sprint	0	1	Sprint Towers	Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
Sprint 0 Out of 5 Phone Model: VI 2300	Utopia, Texas / Hwy1050, Rio Frio, TX 78879	Sat May 12, 2007
Sprint 0 Out of 5 Phone Model: VI 2300	From about 15 miles west of Bandera and all the way to Leakey Texas there was no reception. Some parts of Leakey had marginal reception. I'm thinking about switching to any carrier that has reception from San Antonio to West Texas since I spend my vacations in that area. Used to have better reception a few years ago. I don't understand why the carriers can't share service. Disapointed in Bulverde... .big business sucks, Jerry Lindemann

Page 1 of 1

Newest Cell Phones


HTC Titan	HTC Rezound	HTC Vivid	Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket	Samsung Exhibit 2 4G
AT&T	Verizon	AT&T	AT&T	T-Mobile

View more New Cell Phones

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: