Home > Cell Phone Reception > Cell Phone Coverage Maps > TX > S > Cell Phone Coverage Map in San Angelo, TX > Verizon Coverage Map in San Angelo, TX

Verizon Coverage Map in San Angelo, TX



Verizon coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the San Angelo, TX area.

Carrier

Avg Rating

No. of Comments

Towers

Coverage Map

1. Verizon 4.4 5 Verizon Towers Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.


Page 1 of 1

Comments Towers
FILTER: AT&T NEXTEL SPRINT T-MOBILE VERIZON

Carrier / Rating

Location / Comment

Date


Verizon
4 Out of 5
4 Out of 5

Whole Town, San Angelo, TX 76903 Tue Feb 28, 2012

Verizon's 3g network is just too slow for videos. They need to hurry up and turn on LTE in a town of nearly 100,000 people. Smaller towns across the nation are getting 4g before us which does not make any sense. They are dragging their feet in their rollout in this part of Texas. Other big towns such as Lubbock, Amarillo, Midland / Odessa, and Abilene also do not have 4g. So... Hurry up Verizon!


Verizon
4 Out of 5
4 Out of 5

Whole Town, San Angelo, TX 76903 Thu Feb 16, 2012

The network is really good, but not excellent as far as overall signal strength. I have never had any drop calls anywhere in town, even in areas with only one bar. No problems sending and receiving text messages. If you want a better picture regarding signal strength, check out the "Rootmetrics" website. You can get an idea on signal strength and coverage using real-world data. Overall, verizon's network is extremely hard to beat. Network should be upgraded to LTE sometime in the near future, so data speeds should improve drastically.


Verizon
5 Out of 5
5 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Samsung Reality
Downtown, San Angelo, TX 76903 Sun Apr 17, 2011

Verizon owns Alltel's network in this area. I have never had any problems with Verizon anywhere in town. Very strong signal in most parts of town. No dropped calls ever. Coverage of Grape Creek has improved.


Advertisement
 

Verizon
5 Out of 5
5 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Samsung Reality
Downtown, San Angelo, TX 76903 Sun Aug 15, 2010

Verizon now owns Alltel's network in this area. Alltel was very good. Signal is still strong in many parts of town. Very pleased with the service provided.


Verizon
4 Out of 5
4 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Razr V3m
Southwest Blvd. / Loop 306, San Angelo, TX 76904 Thu Jul 05, 2007

The only real problems I've had are I can't send Pix or Flix via my cell phone due to the fact that I'm always piggybacking off of another provider. I can text okay. I also cannot download new ring tones or use the internet on my phone (which I pay extra for.) I almost never drop calls, which is good. I usually wait to go to Killeen before I download ringtones or send my Pix and Flix. We only go once a month, so it is a major inconvienance. Signal strength is okay, though. A good portion of the time I will have five bars. Not a bad provider, really.




Page 1 of 1


Write a Review on Your Carrier


This site wouldn't be possible without the contributions of visitors like you. If you found the site helpful, please take a moment and share your carrier experiences -- good or bad -- to help others looking for the best carrier in their area. Thank you.

All fields in bold must be completed.

Carrier:

AT&T
Cellular One
Cricket
MetroPCS
Sprint
T-Mobile
US Cellular
Verizon Wireless
Select which network you wish to comment on.

Phone Model:

Enter the phone used to test reception.

Zip Code:

Enter zip code of reception review location.

Location or Major Street:

Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)

Major Street 2:
(For intersections)

If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.

Reception Rating:

5 - Perfect
4 - Good
3 - Average
2 - Below Average
1 - Poor
0 - No Reception
How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)

Comments: