Home > Cell Phone Reception > Cell Phone Coverage Maps > VA > S > Cell Phone Coverage Map in Sterling, VA > Sprint Coverage Map in Sterling, VA

Sprint Coverage Map in Sterling, VA



Sprint coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Sterling, VA area.

Carrier

Avg Rating

No. of Comments

Towers

Coverage Map

1. Sprint 2.14 7 Sprint Towers Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.


Page 1 of 1

Comments Towers
FILTER: AT&T NEXTEL SPRINT T-MOBILE VERIZON

Carrier / Rating

Location / Comment

Date


Sprint
0 Out of 5
0 Out of 5

Rt. 28 / Paciffic Blvd., Sterling, VA 20167 Wed Oct 19, 2011

no bars since I got to work can not call anyone have never had this problem in Eight years.!


Sprint
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Samsung MM-A900 (SPH-A900)
Algonkian Pkwy. / Cascades Pkwy., Sterling, VA 20165 Wed Aug 15, 2007

Extremely poor reception. Don't even bother making calls unless i'm on the Balcony or a certain corner of the house. This area needs a Cell tower badly.


Sprint
3 Out of 5
3 Out of 5

Phone Model:
SPH-A460
Broad Run Dr. / Youngs Cliff Rd., Sterling, VA 20165 Fri Aug 03, 2007

Had Sprint for years. Works great on Broad Run Dr. and Youngs Cliff Rd, however it drops calls on Persimmon (behind hill) traveling into Countryside. Does not work at the 3 schools along Algonkian Pkwy.


Advertisement
 

Sprint
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Sanyo 8100
POTOMAC VIEW / ALGONKIAN PKWY, Sterling, VA 20165 Wed Jul 27, 2005

Poor coverage, frequent dropped calls even though it is a heavilly populated / traveled area. Frequent calls to Sprint have failed to produce any results as far as improving coverage. If you're in your house, FORGET IT!


Sprint
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Samsung SCH-3500
Algonkian / Cascades, Sterling, VA 20165 Thu Jan 06, 2005

Good coverage along route 7. Very spotty coverage in the Cascades area away from Route 7 -- locations on the river side of the hills are blocked from the Route 7 towers and only one tower on the Maryland side just east of Leesburg is providing any direct coverage along Algonkian -- and service from that tower has been fluctuating between average to non-existent over the past 5 months. Not reliable for emergencies if you walk / bike in the area.


Sprint
5 Out of 5
5 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Sanyo SCP-4900
Potomac Falls, Sterling, VA 20164 Sat Sep 18, 2004

Sprint PCS has the best service in the DC area in my view. If you're having problems getting a signal, I used to also. Until I switched to a Sanyo Sprint PCS Phone. Sanyo spends the most time working with Sprint to make their phones. Samsung, LG, Motorola, they all suck with Sprint. Stay with Sprint and get a Sanyo.


Sprint
4 Out of 5
4 Out of 5

Rt 7 / Cascades Parkway, Sterling, VA 20164 Mon Dec 08, 2003

So far the ONLY place where I struggle for a signal is my neighborhood (old Sterling). All other areas the reception is between 80 to 100%




Page 1 of 1


Write a Review on Your Carrier


This site wouldn't be possible without the contributions of visitors like you. If you found the site helpful, please take a moment and share your carrier experiences -- good or bad -- to help others looking for the best carrier in their area. Thank you.

All fields in bold must be completed.

Carrier:

AT&T
Cellular One
Cricket
MetroPCS
Sprint
T-Mobile
US Cellular
Verizon Wireless
Select which network you wish to comment on.

Phone Model:

Enter the phone used to test reception.

Zip Code:

Enter zip code of reception review location.

Location or Major Street:

Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)

Major Street 2:
(For intersections)

If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.

Reception Rating:

5 - Perfect
4 - Good
3 - Average
2 - Below Average
1 - Poor
0 - No Reception
How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)

Comments: