|
Home >
Cell Phone Carriers >
Cell Phone Coverage
> WA >
B >
Bainbridge Island WA Coverage |
|
Bainbridge Island, WA - Cell Phone Coverage |
|
If you would like to give your visitors access to Coverage Comments, you can get the HTML code
to post on your website free! |
Bainbridge Island, WA Cell Phone Service Comments - Read what residents have to say about cell phone coverage in Bainbridge Island, WA. Service
comments are sorted by date. However, users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating,
or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.
For more options, return to the Cell Phone Reception Search.
|
| Carrier / Rating |
Location / Comment
| Date |
Verizon Wireless
 0 Out of 5
Phone Model: LG - several |
High School Rd. / Lovell intersection, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 |
Thu Jul 31, 2008 |
No signal at home on either of our Verizon phones. Despite a month of BS stories -- like "we'll have a new tower up and operating real near your house in just a few days," Verizon plans to have a tech come out and verify that we have no signal. They say that "we've had no complaints about service on Bainbridge." Like, helloooo!
|
 |
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
 |
Verizon Wireless
 0 Out of 5
Phone Model: LG - several |
High School Rd. / Lovell intersection, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 |
Thu Jul 31, 2008 |
No signal at home on either of our Verizon phones. Despite a month of BS stories -- like "we'll have a new tower up and operating real near your house in just a few days," Verizon plans to have a tech come out and verify that we have no signal. They say that "we've had no complaints about service on Bainbridge."
|
 |
AT&T
 0 Out of 5
|
Hidden Cove, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 |
Tue Jul 15, 2008 |
I want to get a new Apple phone and understand that you have to use AT&T service. Does anyone have any experience with this carrier on Bainbridge Island? Do you know if the 3G feature will help reception? Thanks
|
 |
Verizon Wireless
 3 Out of 5
Phone Model: Moto(var) LG(var) Samsung (var) |
South Bainbridge Island, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 |
Sat May 31, 2008 |
I read hundreds of reviews on dozens of sites from tech to blog and compared what friends were getting and I think I have learned a few basic conclusions which no one addresses with any authority in any site I have found so far: First, for reception, which is not a function of your phone's output power: Each service provider's service footprint or coverage area emanates from a tower with a radiowave coverage which is not a perfect circle even in flat terrain. Reception is a function of where your phone / pda is relative to that provider's own or shared / leased towers, where you are in the waveform path; whether there is any interference from physical effects like blocking and reflecting and multipath effects of receiving a signal directly and via a reflection which could make the signal twice as strong or zero. It also seems that during peak periods of use, the output power per incoming call may be affected adversely perhaps with some carriers more than wth others. Peak usage affects available bandwidth and data rates as well, although you might just think it is due to your location, battery strength, orientation of your phone, or some other physical problem and not too many others using the same tower at the same moment. Finally, the manufacturer and model of phone can make a huge difference in reception. I and friends experienced noticeably better signal strength in most difficult reception areas (partially blocked or multi-path over water) using various Motorola phones over Samsung and LG. Verizon, Sprint, and Cingular had less variations when all towers were in sight than the phones themselves and these are all I had access to try. The best performer I found was the Motorola e815 which held good reception under conditions where all others failed... but this was at the expense of battery life which was half the duration advertised. The other side of the coin is how well are you heard at the other end - here it depends on where your phone is in the radiation pattern, whether there is blocking or reflecting, and how strong your phone transmission is... the stronger the better for your listener, but there are growing concerns about safety to your brain and organs and many people are shifting to bluetooth or texting to reduce frequent, strong, and continuous exposure to radation from the phone itself. I have never found any site which could explain why the e815 was so much superior but the halved battery life suggests to me that the phone was sampling multiple tower signals continuously to maintain the optimum signal quality - if this is not what was happening then perhaps it should be and better batteries should be issued as standard. People on the Sound or a lake may experience multipath is worst on calm days when flat water reflects radio waves more coherently between your phone and a tower in your line of sight so both the direct ray and a strong but phase shifted reflected ray arrive simultaneously - you can watch the bars change from 1 or 2 to 5 and back - on rough days the reflected signals are scattered in all directions so the direct path ray arrives with only weak forward reflected energy which causes less interference. Forums such as this really help all of us, but a thought occurred to me while I was surveying for myself: why not interview nearby high shool students who likely use every local carrier and every phone offered by each and they probably use them all over town everyday - I don't have time to develop this test environment but maybe another reader can get something like this started - the resuts would quickly favor the best carrier and the best instruments for that carrier for each city right down to the neighborhood area... Of course I am looking for a phone and not so much an all-in-one mobile email / texting / music / movie / tv / pix / flix / gaming / stylin' device... So now I have concluded that Verizon has the best coverage for me most of the time... BUT their phones are only now becoming balned with the features I need and could use and some of those are locked; they have exhorbitant fees and hidden additional fees for options which should be included; they use double speak and more intent on selling me a clearance phone than a new release which will satisfy my specal requirements; and in that regard, they refuse to let me try more than one or two phones to get one which performs the way I need it to... and I call this "lousy customer service" which is why I dumped Sprint and would never go to ATT / Cingular... so if you may have reason to call upon customer service, this will be yet another important criterion before signing up for more than a one year contract. Hope this helps someone
|
 |
Verizon Wireless
 2 Out of 5
|
Madison, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 |
Wed Apr 16, 2008 |
reception varies: limited near library, at ferry, Eli's flower stand, Blakely grade school. Live in Fort Ward with 2 bars, previously had ATT, could not use at home. Wish providers would share tower signals
|
 |
Verizon Wireless
 3 Out of 5
Phone Model: motorola krzr k1m |
Teem Loop Rd., Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 |
Mon Mar 31, 2008 |
2 to 3 (of four) bars throughout our neighborhood, but no problems sending and receiving calls with Verizon. Verizon seems to have the best coverage on Bainbidge Island in my experience.
|
 |
Verizon Wireless
 1 Out of 5
Phone Model: Verizon Wireless XV6700
|
High School Road / Stonecress, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 |
Sat Jan 05, 2008 |
Verizon wireless claims there is cell phone service on their coverage map in this area. I got no coverage in my townhome and when I called them they transferred me to technical service who asked for my address. They said at my particular address there was little to no service (although the street view of the coverage map said there was). If you call and there is no service at your place of residence you can be allowed out of your contract without paying the cancellation fee. Just call VZW, tell them your problem and they will send transfer you to tech services. You will then have to fax the audit dept after you transfer your number and they will waive the fee.
|
 |
Verizon Wireless
 2 Out of 5
|
High School Rd. / Madison intersection, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 |
Tue Sep 25, 2007 |
We were told we would get good service here (coming from a small upstate New York town) but can't get a thing in our condo. Outside the building reception is fairly good, but we need to stand at the window to get anything indoors. Even moving a foot, or holding the phone the wrong way makes the call drop! It's ridiculous to be so close to a major city and have this kind of problem.
|
 |
T-Mobile
 0 Out of 5
Phone Model: Motorolla (and others) |
Winslow Way / Madison intersection, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 |
Mon Aug 20, 2007 |
Just moved here. No reception on T-Mobile for most of downtown Bainbridge Island. Especially near the Town and Country - the real town center. T-Mobile says there is no problem because their coverage maps say it is okay. None of our three different phones work here, but they refuse to acknowledge a problem. So we'll all be switching as soon as I find out which system DOES work here.
|
 |
Verizon Wireless
 1 Out of 5
Phone Model: Palm Treo 650 |
High School Rd. / Lovell intersection, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 |
Fri Jul 06, 2007 |
Phone is almost usless at home. I spent quite a bit of money putting in a repeater and only got about 1 more bar (up to 2 maybe). My neighbor says he gets so much signal (Cingular, from the tower 1 block away), his phone burns his hand. I think that the Cingular signal drowns out all the Verizon signal. I am planning to switch to Cingular.
|
 |
|
1, 2 Next |
| Page 1 of 2 |
Cell Phone Reception Review Form
|
|
|
|