Home > Cell Phone Reception > Cell Phone Coverage Maps > WA > K > Cell Phone Coverage Map in Kelso, WA > AT&T Coverage Map in Kelso, WA

AT&T Coverage Map in Kelso, WA



AT&T coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Kelso, WA area.

Carrier

Avg Rating

No. of Comments

Towers

Coverage Map

1. AT&T 3 7 AT&T Towers Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.


Page 1 of 1

Comments Towers
FILTER: AT&T NEXTEL SPRINT T-MOBILE VERIZON

Carrier / Rating

Location / Comment

Date


AT&T
5 Out of 5
5 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Nokia 2330
2521 Allen / Corduoy Rd., Kelso, WA 98626 Sun Jan 30, 2011

Found out that AT&T has a new tower at kelso high school baseball field, they made a contract with city of kelso this used to be a cellphone dead spot not no more. Verizon also made a contract but have not started construction on their tower yet but will be in the near future great news for those how live in this area. Us cellular also has a tower up on the hill they work good in this area two.


AT&T
5 Out of 5
5 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Nokia 2330
2521 Allen / Corduoy Rd., Kelso, WA 98626 Fri Jan 28, 2011

Had sprint, it only had one bar and would switch between Sprint and roaming which was a us cellular tower, AT&T did not work well in this area a few years ago, but know it works great full bars inside. For this area AT&T and us cellular have the most towers compared to all other carriers. Check for your self on the tower map above.


AT&T
2 Out of 5
2 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Apple iPhone
Sparks Area In Lexington / West Side Hwy., Kelso, WA 98626 Thu Aug 19, 2010

I've had no service at home tonight--most of the time it's spotty depending on where I am in the house. It always strikes me as odd that I had an issue in the first place considering how wide open the area is. And it's all of a few hundred feet of I-5!


Advertisement
 

AT&T
0 Out of 5
0 Out of 5

Duncan / Fish Pond, Kelso, WA 98626 Sat Jun 30, 2007

This phone has all the bells and whistles, but gets lousy reception. I am not happy with Cingular at all.


AT&T
3 Out of 5
3 Out of 5

Phone Model:
V3 RAZR
Mt. Pleasant Rd., Kelso, WA 98626 Mon Jul 24, 2006

Average reception for most of Mt. Pleasant Rd. There are a few deadspots between Kool Rd and Harrison Rd, and Kool Rd. and Hwy. 99.


AT&T
5 Out of 5
5 Out of 5

Phone Model:
Nokia 6620
Carrol Rd. / Walker Rd., Kelso, WA 98626 Tue Sep 27, 2005

Reception can break up some around the rock pit on the East side of the ridge. Anything north has great reception. Tower is located on I-5 just south of this location about 2 miles as the crow flies.


AT&T
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
nokia 3120
Ostrander Rd., Kelso, WA 98626 Thu Aug 11, 2005

I dont know why they claim "more bars in more places. In my opinion thier service is terrible. No wonder they give roll over minutes, no one could ever use all their minutes with the zero reception you get with this service.




Page 1 of 1


Write a Review on Your Carrier


This site wouldn't be possible without the contributions of visitors like you. If you found the site helpful, please take a moment and share your carrier experiences -- good or bad -- to help others looking for the best carrier in their area. Thank you.

All fields in bold must be completed.

Carrier:

AT&T
Cellular One
Cricket
MetroPCS
Sprint
T-Mobile
US Cellular
Verizon Wireless
Select which network you wish to comment on.

Phone Model:

Enter the phone used to test reception.

Zip Code:

Enter zip code of reception review location.

Location or Major Street:

Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)

Major Street 2:
(For intersections)

If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.

Reception Rating:

5 - Perfect
4 - Good
3 - Average
2 - Below Average
1 - Poor
0 - No Reception
How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)

Comments: