|
|
|
|
AT&T
0 Out of 5
Phone Model:
Samsung Galaxy |
NAS Whidbey, Oak Harbor, WA 98278 |
Sat Aug 27, 2011 |
This is ridiculous! The AT&T coverage map says this area has the best coverage. No matter where I am on base there are ZERO bars or one on a good day. I can't believe I actually have to go out to town in order to use my cell.
|
|
AT&T
1 Out of 5
Phone Model:
Samsung Captivate |
Rolling Hills Area / Native St., Oak Harbor, WA 98277 |
Thu Apr 14, 2011 |
Used to get good coverage, but for the past two months almost no coverage. Many many many dropped calls. AT&T not too interested in doing anything to improve the quality or restore service to previous level.
|
|
AT&T
1 Out of 5
Phone Model:
lg vu |
Green Acres Lane, Oak Harbor, WA 98277 |
Fri Oct 22, 2010 |
Reception is absolutely terrible. Am thinking of a signal booster but if I get a terrible signal any way it will only repeat the terrible signal need better cell phone coverage. AT&T needs more towers
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
AT&T
2 Out of 5
Phone Model:
blackberry bold(9000) |
Busby Rd. / Eagle Ridge, Oak Harbor, WA 98277 |
Mon Aug 17, 2009 |
The closest tower is over a mile east by south east but to to the topography (lay of the land) inhibits a signal in my neighborhood. Having a wifi network and a smartphone that can connect to that network, it helps with sending data to and from the outside world; but doesn't do much for making calls. Getting a in house amp(1900 / 800 ghz GSM network) will help out alot.
|
|
AT&T
0 Out of 5
Phone Model:
Apple iPhone 3G
|
Island View Rd., Oak Harbor, WA 98277 |
Sat Apr 11, 2009 |
Terrible reception is any at all. Only retrieve service about every five minutes and even then, your phone needs to be exactly stationary and in a precise position. I do with AT&T would divert some of their budget into covering more of this area with stronger coverage.
|
|
AT&T
2 Out of 5
Phone Model:
LG C1300
|
NAS WI, Oak Harbor, WA 98278 |
Sun Jun 10, 2007 |
Not too happy with the reception on base. Many locations are either completly dead or in and out. Not so bad out in town but poor again on West Beach and Libby. Looking for a good provider for both the NAS and West Beach area.
|
|
AT&T
0 Out of 5
|
SW Talon Loop / Senic VIew, Oak Harbor, WA 98277 |
Wed Jun 14, 2006 |
Worst reception I have ever had anywhere with no great improvement by changing to another company (Sprint)
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
Nextel
3 Out of 5
|
Oak Harbor, Oak Harbor, WA 98278 |
Tue Oct 04, 2011 |
I've been using boost mobile here in Oak Harbor for the past 6+ months and overall service is pretty good. I have atleast 2-3 bars indoors on base. The only spots where my service drops, all my friends phones drop too. So besides a few dead zones, service is good.
|
|
Sprint
1 Out of 5
Phone Model:
Samsung Instinct (SPH-M800)
|
Ft.Nugent / Zylstra, Oak Harbor, WA 98277 |
Mon Aug 18, 2008 |
Wow -3rd world is about right. I just switched from Nextel to Sprint, but it ain't 'sprint'ing by any means. Missed calls, POOR reception (1-2 bars at most on a good day) OK in town like everyone else, Wally World and Albertsons are completely out on both carriers. I guess since we just got electricity, we have to wait for a decent phone...
|
|
Sprint
2 Out of 5
Phone Model:
Sanyo 4200 (?) |
Ft. Nugent Rd. Near West Beach / Zylstra Rd., Oak Harbor, WA 98277 |
Wed Jun 14, 2006 |
Reception here is poor and varies from 1 to 2 bars. Lots of dropped calls. Considered using a Sprint card for internet service but don't want poor reception on the internet. Seven years ago we started with AT&T. Service at first was very bad but improved to about 3 bars. Quit them because their pricing scheme sometimes cost us boucoup bucks due to delayed billing especially when roaming in B.C. Canada-- from their Rogers Network which was owned by AT&T. We like Sprint's "Fair and (automatically) Flexible" plan, but reception sucks. We're considering Verison when our contract is up.
|
|
