Cell Phone Coverage in Hammond, WI - Cell Phone Carriers

Carrier	Avg Rating	No. of Comments
T-Mobile	4	1
Sprint	1	1

Coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Hammond, WI area.

Comments are sorted by date. However, users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments

Towers

Carrier / Rating	Location / Comment	Date
Sprint 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: Sanyo RL-4920	Meadows, Hammond, WI 54015	Fri Feb 10, 2006
Sprint 1 Out of 5 Phone Model: Sanyo RL-4920	Usually zero bars... occationally one bar. This is a known coverage hole in Hammond... still trying to get out of my contract since it does not work here. We moved from River Falls, and I had been happy with Spring in the many areas I have lived in the past, but here in Hammond it just doesn't cut it. Someone must have decent service because every once in a while we go digial roaming and get two bars... not sure who it is but will be testing for it shortly.

Advertisement
Advertisement

T-Mobile 4 Out of 5 Phone Model: Samsung SGH-E105	Hammond, Hammond, WI 54015	Thu Jul 28, 2005
T-Mobile 4 Out of 5 Phone Model: Samsung SGH-E105	great in hammond

Page 1 of 1

Cell Phone Reception Review Form

All fields in bold need to be completed.
Carrier:	Alltel AT&T (Cingular) Cellular One Cricket MetroPCS Nextel Qwest Sprint T-Mobile US Cellular Verizon Wireless Virgin Mobile	Select which network you wish to comment on.
Phone Model:		Enter the phone used to test reception.
Zip Code:		Enter zip code of reception review location.
Location or Major Street:		Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)
Major Street 2: (For intersections)		If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.
Reception Rating:	5 - Perfect 4 - Good 3 - Average 2 - Below Average 1 - Poor 0 - No Reception	How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)
Comments: