Home > Cell Phone Reception > Cell Phone Coverage Maps > WI > R > Cell Phone Coverage Map in Reedsburg, WI

Cell Phone Coverage Map in Reedsburg, WI - By Zip Code



Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Reedsburg, WI area.

Carrier

Avg Rating

No. of Comments

Towers

Coverage Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.


Page 1 of 1

Comments Towers
FILTER: AT&T NEXTEL SPRINT T-MOBILE VERIZON

Carrier / Rating

Location / Comment

Date


US Cellular
1 Out of 5
1 Out of 5

Phone Model:
basic $20 starter and MRazor
Near Ho-Chunk Casino, Reedsburg, WI 53959 Sun Jul 22, 2007

It's seriously 0-1 bars here. Could not use the cheap starter phone indoors without it dropping the call in 10 minutes. Outside it was better, but not by much. With the Motorola Razor, it at least would stay at one bar about 90% of the time, but it was still pretty bad.




Page 1 of 1


Write a Review on Your Carrier


This site wouldn't be possible without the contributions of visitors like you. If you found the site helpful, please take a moment and share your carrier experiences -- good or bad -- to help others looking for the best carrier in their area. Thank you.

All fields in bold must be completed.

Carrier:

AT&T
Cellular One
Cricket
MetroPCS
Sprint
T-Mobile
US Cellular
Verizon Wireless
Select which network you wish to comment on.

Phone Model:

Enter the phone used to test reception.

Zip Code:

Enter zip code of reception review location.

Location or Major Street:

Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)

Major Street 2:
(For intersections)

If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.

Reception Rating:

5 - Perfect
4 - Good
3 - Average
2 - Below Average
1 - Poor
0 - No Reception
How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)

Comments: