Home > Cell Phone Reception > Cell Phone Coverage Maps > WY > L > Cell Phone Coverage Map in Lusk, WY

Cell Phone Coverage Map in Lusk, WY - By Zip Code


Cell phone coverage comments are submitted voluntarily by visitors around the Lusk, WY area.

Carrier

Avg Rating

No. of Comments

Towers

Coverage Map
1. Verizon 0 1 Verizon Towers Map

Coverage comments are sorted by date. Users can sort by Carrier, City, Zip Code, Reception Rating, or Date by clicking on the header below. To search by zip code, use the search box to the right.

Page 1 of 1

Comments Towers
FILTER: AT&T NEXTEL SPRINT T-MOBILE VERIZON

Carrier / Rating

Location / Comment

Date
Verizon
0 Out of 5
0 Out of 5

 US 18-85 / WYO 270, Lusk, WY 82225 Mon Aug 22, 2011

There is no cell phone service from any carrier north of Lusk, Wyoming until you are just outside Newcastle, Wyoming or Edgemont South Dakota. This is a busy highway with a lot of crazy drivers in the summer months. 911 does not work to report any car crashes and there have been a lot crashes.



Page 1 of 1

Write a Review on Your Carrier


This site wouldn't be possible without the contributions of visitors like you. If you found the site helpful, please take a moment and share your carrier experiences -- good or bad -- to help others looking for the best carrier in their area. Thank you.

All fields in bold must be completed.

Carrier:

 AT&T
Cellular One
Cricket
MetroPCS
Sprint
T-Mobile
US Cellular
Verizon Wireless		 Select which network you wish to comment on.

Phone Model:

 Enter the phone used to test reception.

Zip Code:

 Enter zip code of reception review location.

Location or Major Street:

 Enter location of reception review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc)

Major Street 2:
(For intersections)

 If at intersection enter the major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2. Otherwise enter in Street 1 and leave Street 2 blank.

Reception Rating:

 5 - Perfect
4 - Good
3 - Average
2 - Below Average
1 - Poor
0 - No Reception		 How many bars of reception do you get? (Out of 5)

Comments: