Write a Review

Found Us Helpful? Please Write a Review.

Sacramento, CA 95841 Carrier Reviews & Coverage Maps

1. Verizon 2.5 star rating (2.5 stars | 48 Reviews)
2. T-Mobile 1.9 star rating (1.9 stars | 74 Reviews)
3. Sprint 1.7 star rating (1.7 stars | 61 Reviews)
4. AT&T 1.4 star rating (1.4 stars | 118 Reviews)

Total Coverage 1.8 star rating (1.8 stars | 347 Reviews)
Verizon Towers
T-Mobile Towers
Sprint Towers
AT&T Towers

All Towers


0 Out of 5 (0 stars) | Elkhorn Blvd. | Larchmont, North Highlands, CA 95660 |

Sprint is awful in North Highlands. My family and I (4 total) have had Virgin Mobile or Boost Mobile for several years (they are both subdivisions of Sprint) in Antelope area and never had problems at all with reception. I switched to Sprint a couple months ago and have 0 bars literally everywhere. It was so bad Sprint sent me something called a Magic Box so I could get reception at home. I still don’t get reception anywhere else though. I get 1 or 0 bars at work (Rio Linda), zero bars anywhere in north highlands and surrounding areas from Watt and Elkhorn down to Walegra all the way out to Scandia. I get 4 bars in parts of Roseville and 1 or 0 bars in other parts. Home is basically the only place I get reception and that’s only because of the magic box they sent. I can’t wait for my contract to end so I can switch back to AT&T. My phone is basically unusable unless I’m home.. but at that point I’m connected to WiFi anyways. I guess I don’t ever have to worry about going over my 3GB data. The last 5 months with Sprint I’ve never used more than 1GB data and I work 5 days a week so it’s not like I’m home all day, I just physically can’t use data because the reception is non existent. I have an iPhone and my roommate has a new galaxy and she doesn’t get good reception with Sprint either. She has 1-2 bars basically everything she goes too.

Was this review helpful to you?


4 Out of 5 (4 stars) | Sutter St. | Bridge St., Folsom, CA 95630 |

I have had ATT in Folsom for many years, decades, and the cell service is good. I have never had any issues at all in town so I am surprised to see complaints. I just wish the coast reception was better, I lose reception until I get out on the ocean then I can receive it as long as I don't hug the beach.

Was this review helpful to you?


1 Out of 5 (1 star) | Fiddyment | Blueoaks, Roseville, CA 95747 |

At&t promised a new tower in our area, but when it was put up reception only got slightly better. Still have horrible reception, dropped calls, not receiving txt, missed calls because of no reception. There are still large areas in the neighborhood that have no reception at all.

Was this review helpful to you?


2 Out of 5 (2 stars) | Walerga | Antelope , Antelope, CA 95843 |

Internet is very very slow, reception is 2 bars which is very low to

Was this review helpful to you?


1 Out of 5 (1 star) | Auburn and Watt, Sacramento, CA 95821 |

Verizon used to be best hands down but you pay for it. Now it is just as bad or worse then the cheapest plans from the companies that don't even have their own cell towers. After complaining five times in the last 2 years I finally got someone at Verizon that would tell me the truth. It was a business decision my Verizon to cut their data bandwidth to consumers and shift it focus on government and large corporations. It's been about 4 years since my Verizon service where I live turned off like a light switch. It used to run faster than my Wi-Fi. Now I can't do much of anything with the bandwidth they allow. I have to switch to Wi-Fi to run my phone. Might as well just get the cheapest service because they all suck.

Was this review helpful to you?


1 Out of 5 (1 star) | 21st St. | 3rd Ave., Sacramento, CA 95818 |

in the capitol city of the most populated state one might think that cell "service" would be good. it's not. zero bars in any down stairs room. for a phone call, I need to go into the back yard for clear reception. it's a good thing that a.t.t. doesn't charge and excessive amount. oh wait, they do.

Was this review helpful to you?


4 Out of 5 (4 stars) | Saint Armel St., Roseville, CA 95747 |

12 / 08 / 2019 The cellular reception is considered very good now. I can send and recieve cell calls and also send and recieve messages. Two months ago when visiting my son here, I could not send or receive phone calls and send or receive messages. Finally ATT probably installed a new cell tower. I am now happy with ATT... ... ...

Was this review helpful to you?


1 Out of 5 (1 star) | 12750 Evanston Way | Roamer , Rancho Cordova, CA 95742 |

Att reception is very poor. 1 bar to No bars or no service! Worst, I can’t be inside my home when I make a telephone call.

Was this review helpful to you?


2 Out of 5 (2 stars) | 920 Pleasant Grove Blvd, Roseville, CA 95678, Roseville, CA 95678 |

Coverage is horrible in the shopping plaza despite there being a T-Mobile store right here.

Was this review helpful to you?


5 Out of 5 (5 stars) | 1410 Rocky Ridge Dr, Roseville, CA 95661, Roseville, CA 95661 |

Reception is so good I use it when WiFi is being spotty.

Was this review helpful to you?

Found Us Useful? Help Us Out -- Write a Review!

This site wouldn't be possible without contributions from people like you. If you found us helpful, please take a moment and leave a review to help others. Thank you!

All fields in bold must be completed.


Cellular One
US Cellular

Zip Code:

Where is the location of your review?

Location or Major Street:

Enter location of review. (ie: Landmark, building, major roads, etc.)

Major Street 2:

For intersections. Enter major cross streets in Street 1 and Street 2.


How would you rate your reception?
Rating: 5 of 5 - Perfect
Rating: 4 of 5 - Good
Rating: 3 of 5 - Average
Rating: 2 of 5 - Below Average
Rating: 1 of 5 - Poor
Rating: 0 of 5 - No Reception


Must contain at least 20 words.

Phone Model:

What phone model did you use to test reception?